Collaborative Glossaries: Building One for Global Teams

Collaborative Glossaries: Building One for Global Teams
Dec 23, 2025
SumaLatam

Introduction

A collaborative glossary is the backbone of terminological consistency in global projects. More than a word list, it’s a living system that reduces errors, speeds up workflows, and aligns translators, reviewers, clinical teams and product owners. This guide covers governance, change control and the processes and tools that keep a glossary useful over time.

Why build a collaborative glossary?

  • Ensures consistent terminology across languages and teams.
  • Reduces repetitive queries and review time.
  • Eases onboarding for new markets and domains.
  • Provides documented decisions for audits and compliance.

Governance: who decides and how

  1. Glossary owner: a person or team accountable for maintenance, access and policies.
  2. Terminology committee: cross-functional group (linguists, clinicians, regulatory, product) that adjudicates disputed entries.
  3. Roles & permissions: define who can propose, who can review and who can publish changes.
  4. Editorial policy: rules on style, abbreviations, capitalization and canonical forms.

Change control and traceability

  • Proposal log: every new entry or edit must include date, author and justification (clinical source or product rationale).
  • Lifecycle states: draft → in review → approved → deprecated.
  • Version history: retain prior versions for auditability and rollback.
  • Alerts: notify stakeholders automatically when critical terms change (e.g., active ingredient names, warnings).

Minimum structure for a useful entry

  • Source term (source language).
  • Equivalent(s) by target language, with regional variant tags.
  • Category (e.g., drug, symptom, procedure).
  • Usage note (context, exceptions, sample sentences).
  • Validation source (clinical guideline, manual).
  • Status and approver.

Tools and practices to keep it alive

  • Central cloud repository: accessible to the whole team, with version control.
  • Workflow integration: connect the glossary to the translation management system or CMS for inline suggestions.
  • Structured submission forms: ensure proposals capture all metadata.
  • Periodic review cycle: quarterly or semiannual audits to remove obsolete entries and update mappings.
  • Ongoing training: educate translators, reviewers and clinical stakeholders on policies and workflows.

Practical governance process (suggested)

  1. Term proposed by any team member.
  2. Owner performs duplicate check and basic validation.
  3. Committee reviews and votes.
  4. Approved entry published and stakeholders notified.
  5. Entry included in translation memories and QA checks.

KPIs and success metrics

  • % of TM matches using glossary-approved terms.
  • Number of terminology queries per month (declining trend signals adoption).
  • Average time to resolve proposals.
  • Number of obsolete entries after audit.

Conclusion 

A well-governed, change-controlled collaborative glossary pays off in quality, speed and compliance for global medical projects. At SumaLatam we design glossary governance, implement change-control workflows and deploy collaborative repositories that the whole team will use. Contact us to build your glossary.

AI + Human Workflows: Best Practices for Regulatory Documents

Introduction Combining artificial intelligence with human review can speed up regulatory translations while preserving quality if the workflow is properly designed. This guide explains when to use machine translation plus post-editing, the risks to avoid, and the...